CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio P95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio P95
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
MediaTek Helio P95
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 1800MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs. 8 cores 2200MHz MediaTek Helio P95 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
MediaTek Helio P95 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.1552 TFLOPS vs 0.1248 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2200MHz vs 1800MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 14nm)
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
179988
MediaTek Helio P95
+67%
301054
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
296
MediaTek Helio P95
+54%
456
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
1047
MediaTek Helio P95
+48%
1555
FP32 (float)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
124
MediaTek Helio P95
+25%
155
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
VS
MediaTek Helio P95
CPU
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1800 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
-
L2 cache
1 MB
14 nm
Process
12 nm
2
Transistor count
-
5 W
TDP
5 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Adreno 506
GPU name
PowerVR GM9446
650 MHz
GPU frequency
970 MHz
1
Execution units
10
96
Shading units
8
8
Max size
8
0.1248 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1552 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
12
Memory
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR4X
933 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
13.91 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
Hexagon 546
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 2.0
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
1900 x 1200
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
1x 40MP, 2x 13MP
Max camera resolution
1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
X9
Modem
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 12
No
5G support
No
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 600 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
5.0
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Info
Jun 2018
Announced
Feb 2020
Mid range
Class
Mid range
SDM632
Model number
MT6779V/CV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Official page
MediaTek Helio P95
Related SoC Comparison
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G70
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G88
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy