Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tiger T615

Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tiger T615

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 1560MHz Samsung Exynos 7884B vs. 8 cores 1800MHz Unisoc Tiger T615 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Unisoc Tiger T615 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.1088 TFLOPS vs 0.0493 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (1800MHz vs 1560MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 14nm)
Released 4 years and 11 months late

Score

Benchmark

AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 7884B
194290
Unisoc Tiger T615 +33%
259833
FP32 (float)
Samsung Exynos 7884B
49
Unisoc Tiger T615 +120%
108
VS

CPU

2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A73
6x 1.35 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
1560 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
14 nm
Process
12 nm
2
Transistor count
-
5 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC

Graphics

Mali-G71 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
770 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
2
Execution units
-
16
Shading units
64
4
Max size
12
0.0493 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1088 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
-

Memory

LPDDR4
Memory type
LPDDR4X
1866 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
7.8 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
2220 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
1x 21MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 12
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Sep 2019
Announced
Aug 2024
Low end
Class
Low end

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy