Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Unisoc Tiger T620

Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Unisoc Tiger T620

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2200MHz Samsung Exynos 7885 vs. 8 cores 2200MHz Unisoc Tiger T620 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Samsung Exynos 7885 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.0704 TFLOPS vs 0.0544 TFLOPS )
Unisoc Tiger T620 Advantages
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 14nm)
Released 6 years and 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 7885
186748
Unisoc Tiger T620 +80%
336384
FP32 (float)
Samsung Exynos 7885 +29%
70
Unisoc Tiger T620
54
VS

CPU

2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2200 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
14 nm
Process
12 nm
2
Transistor count
-
8 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC

Graphics

Mali-G71 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
2
Execution units
-
16
Shading units
32
6
Max size
8
0.0704 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0544 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
-

Memory

LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
1866 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
7.46 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
2220 x 1080
Max display resolution
2400 x 1080
1x 21MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 12
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Feb 2018
Announced
Aug 2024
Mid range
Class
Low end
S5E7885
Model number
-

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy