Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Unisoc SC9863A vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

Unisoc SC9863A vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 1600MHz Unisoc SC9863A vs. 8 cores 2120MHz HiSilicon Kirin 655 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Unisoc SC9863A Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.0704 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
Lower TDP (3W vs 5W)
Released 1 years and 11 months late
HiSilicon Kirin 655 Advantages
Higher Frequency (2120MHz vs 1600MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 28nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Unisoc SC9863A
165
HiSilicon Kirin 655 +14%
189
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Unisoc SC9863A +5%
730
HiSilicon Kirin 655
694
FP32 (float)
Unisoc SC9863A +22%
70
HiSilicon Kirin 655
57
VS

CPU

4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.12 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1600 MHz
Frequency
2120 MHz
8
Cores
8
28 nm
Process
16 nm
-
Transistor count
4
3 W
TDP
5 W

Graphics

PowerVR GE8322
GPU name
Mali-T830 MP2
550 MHz
GPU frequency
900 MHz
8
Execution units
2
8
Shading units
16
4
Max size
4
0.0704 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0576 TFLOPS
1.1
Vulkan version
1.0
1.2
OpenCL version
1.2
11
DirectX version
11

Memory

LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR3
1800 MHz
Memory frequency
933 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 32 Bit

AI

No
NPU
No

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
2160 x 1080
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
1x 16MP, 2x 5MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
1K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
1080p at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
4
Wi-Fi
4
4.2
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Nov 2018
Announced
Dec 2016
Low end
Class
Mid range

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy