CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
VS
Unisoc Tiger T700
Samsung Exynos 2200
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 1820MHz Unisoc Tiger T700 vs. 8 cores 2800MHz Samsung Exynos 2200 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Samsung Exynos 2200 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (3.1104 TFLOPS vs 0.0816 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2800MHz vs 1820MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 12nm)
Lower TDP (7W vs 10W)
Released 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Unisoc Tiger T700
245659
Samsung Exynos 2200
+274%
920435
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Unisoc Tiger T700
430
Samsung Exynos 2200
+270%
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Unisoc Tiger T700
1442
Samsung Exynos 2200
+155%
3685
FP32 (float)
Unisoc Tiger T700
81
Samsung Exynos 2200
+3739%
3110
Unisoc Tiger T700
VS
Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
1820 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Process
4 nm
10 W
TDP
7 W
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
Mali-G52 MP2
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
850 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
2
Execution units
3
24
Shading units
640
6
Max size
24
0.0816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
12
Memory
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
1866 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
AI
Yes
NPU
Yes
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
2160 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
1K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
1080p at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
Exynos 5300
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 3670 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
6
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Info
Mar 2021
Announced
Jan 2022
Low end
Class
Flagship
-
Model number
S5E9925
-
Official page
Samsung Exynos 2200
Related SoC Comparison
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
2
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
6
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc T606
7
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Apple A13 Bionic
8
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
9
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
10
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy