Radeon R9 285X vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

VS

Radeon R9 285X GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

主要差異

Radeon R9 285X 的優勢

Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)

896 additional rendering cores

GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 的優勢

Boost Clock888MHz

Lower TDP (130W vs 200W)

評分

基準測試

FP32浮點性能

Radeon R9 285X +100%

4104

GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

2046

Radeon R9 285X

VS

GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

Graphics Card

Unknown

Release Date

Aug 2013

Volcanic Islands

Generation

GeForce 700

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

823 MHz

-

Boost Clock

888 MHz

1375 MHz

Memory Clock

1400 MHz

Memory

3GB

Memory Size

3GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

256bit

264.0GB/s

Bandwidth

179.2GB/s

Render Config

32

Compute Units

-

2048

Shading Units

1152

128

TMUs

96

32

ROPs

32

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per SMX)

768 KB

L2 Cache

512 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

21.31 GPixel/s

128.3 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

85.25 GTexel/s

4.104 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.046 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

85.25 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga

GPU Name

GK104

Tonga XT (215-0851313)

GPU Variant

GK104-200-KD-A2

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Kepler

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

28 nm

5 billion

Transistors

3.54 billion

366 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

200W

TDP

130W

550 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.1

-

CUDA

3.0

6.3

Shader Model

5.1