Home Comparison AMD EPYC 75F3 vs Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2

AMD EPYC 75F3 vs Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 75F3 with 32 cores 2.95GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 75F3 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.95GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 75F3 +228%
1762
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
536
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 75F3 +792%
16249
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
1820
Blender
AMD EPYC 75F3 +2753%
799
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
28
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2021
Release Date
Sep 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Milan
Core Architecture
Ivy Bridge-E
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)

Package

33.2 billions
Transistor Count
1.86 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
130 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
70 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x81 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²
12 nm
I/O Process Size
-
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.95 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.5
Multiplier
30.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
10 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
4
Cores per CCD
-
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3-1600
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy