AMD EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E 2486
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon E 2486 with 6 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8324P 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 18MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Xeon E 2486 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 8324P
1664
Xeon E 2486
+64%
2745
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 8324P
+26%
13349
Xeon E 2486
10561
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Dec 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-S
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon E (Raptor Lake)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
95 W
75 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
163 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
32
Total Core Count
6
64
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
35.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
18 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
16
