AMD EPYC 8324P vs Xeon X5365
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8324P 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)
Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 8324P
+421%
1664
Xeon X5365
319
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 8324P
+814%
13349
Xeon X5365
1459
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
150 W
75 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x73 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
9.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
0
96
PCIe Lanes
-
