AMD EPYC 9475F vs Intel Xeon Phi 7235
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7235 with 64 cores 1.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 1.3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7235 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 400W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2017
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Mill
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Mill)
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
250 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.4 GHz
48
Total Core Count
64
96
Total Thread Count
256
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
13.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
