Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9575F vs Opteron 43CX EE

AMD EPYC 9575F vs Opteron 43CX EE

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9575F with 64 cores 3.3GHz and Opteron 43CX EE with 4 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9575F 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 43CX EE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Seoul
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket C32
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Seoul)

Package

66.52 billions
Transistor Count
1.2 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

64
Performance Cores
-
128
Performance Core Threads
-
3.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64
Total Core Count
4
128
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
11.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy