AMD EPYC 9575F vs Xeon 6756E
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9575F with 64 cores 3.3GHz and Xeon 6756E with 128 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9575F 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 96MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)
Xeon 6756E 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 6000)
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Sierra Forest
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4710
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon 6(Sierra Forest-SP)
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
225 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
96°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
10 nm
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
64
Performance Cores
-
128
Performance Core Threads
-
3.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
64
Total Core Count
128
128
Total Thread Count
128
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
18.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per module
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
96 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
6 TB
Max Memory Size
1 TB
12
Max Memory Channels
8
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
