Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon Platinum 8280M

AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon Platinum 8280M

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon Platinum 8280M with 28 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 38.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Xeon Platinum 8280M 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (205W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9654 +146%
1984
Xeon Platinum 8280M
805
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9654 +192%
19940
Xeon Platinum 8280M
6820
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Dec 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
205 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
96
Total Core Count
28
192
Total Thread Count
56
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
27.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
38.5 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy