CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Comparison
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon Max 9480
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon Max 9480
VS
AMD EPYC 9654P
Intel Xeon Max 9480
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Max 9480 with 56 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9654P 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.9GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 112.5MB)
Intel Xeon Max 9480 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 360W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9654P
+7%
2075
Intel Xeon Max 9480
1925
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9654P
+289%
22897
Intel Xeon Max 9480
5876
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9654P
+37%
1467
Intel Xeon Max 9480
1068
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9654P
+117%
77251
Intel Xeon Max 9480
35554
AMD EPYC 9654P
VS
Intel Xeon Max 9480
General Parameters
Nov 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids HBM
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Max (Sapphire Rapids)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
360 W
Power Consumption
350 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
64 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
4x477 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
FC-LGA6096
Package
FC-LGA16A
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
96
Total Core Count
56
192
Total Thread Count
112
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
19.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
112.5 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
-
HBM
up to 64GB
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
12
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
128
PCIe Lanes
80
Related CPU Comparisons
1
Intel Xeon E5 2403 vs AMD EPYC 9654P
2
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon E7 8891 v3
3
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon E5 2692 v2
4
AMD EPYC 9654P vs AMD EPYC 9654
5
AMD EPYC 9654P vs AMD EPYC 7663P
6
Intel Xeon X5647 vs AMD EPYC 9654P
7
Intel Xeon E5 2686 v3 vs AMD EPYC 9654P
8
Intel Xeon Max 9480 vs Xeon E 2468
9
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon E5 1650
10
AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon E5 1680 v3
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy