AMD EPYC 9654P vs Intel Xeon Phi 7110P
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7110P with 61 cores 1.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9654P 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.25GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7110P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 360W)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.25 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
61
192
Total Thread Count
244
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
