AMD EPYC 9684X vs Intel Xeon Phi 3120A
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9684X with 96 cores 2.55GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9684X 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 3120A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Genoa-X
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
135.24 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.55 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
57
192
Total Thread Count
228
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
1152 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
460.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
