AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with 18 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (2667 vs 2133)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24.75MB vs 16MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
+29%
1024
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
+211%
6493
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Cooper Lake-SP
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon Gold (Cooper Lake-SP)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
150 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
8
Total Core Count
18
8
Total Thread Count
36
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
25.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
24.75 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
4
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-2667
2
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
48
