AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Opteron X1150
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Opteron X1150 with 4 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X1150 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Lower TDP (17W vs 30W)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Kyoto
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
17 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
213 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
20.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR3
2
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
-
32
PCIe Lanes
-
