AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Opteron X2 165
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Opteron X2 165 with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 400)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 90nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 110W)
Opteron X2 165 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (1.8GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Denmark
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
0.233 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
110 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
65 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
213 mm²
Die Size
199 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
2
8
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
9.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
128 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR1-400
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
-
32
PCIe Lanes
-
