AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon W 1390
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Xeon W 1390 with 8 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)
Xeon W 1390 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Xeon W 1390
+183%
2233
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
Xeon W 1390
+358%
9575
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Rocket Lake-S
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 1200
N/A
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics P750
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon W (Rocket Lake-S)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
80 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
28.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
4
32
PCIe Lanes
20
