AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon X7450
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Xeon X7450 with 6 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 667)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 45nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 90W)
Xeon X7450 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Dunnington
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 604
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon MP (Dunnington)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
1.9 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
90 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
503 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
6
8
Total Thread Count
6
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
266 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
9.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per module
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
4
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3-667
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
0
32
PCIe Lanes
-
