Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 with 16 cores 2.15GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 's Advantages
Released 117 years and 1 months late
Higher base frequency (2.15GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 +20%
613
Centaur CHA
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 +148%
8408
Centaur CHA
3379
VS

General Parameters

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
100 W
Power Consumption
70 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
2x213 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²

CPU Performance

2.15 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.5
Multiplier
12.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
32 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy