Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 with 16 cores 2.15GHz and Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 270W)
Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.15GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (48MB vs 32MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
613
Intel Xeon W 3365 +58%
973
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
8408
Intel Xeon W 3365 +155%
21500
VS

General Parameters

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-W
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)

Package

4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
100 W
Power Consumption
270 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
81 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
2x213 mm²
Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.15 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
16
Total Core Count
32
32
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.5
Multiplier
27.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
32 MB shared
L3 Cache
48 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
64
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy