Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 with 32 cores 3.25GHz and Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.25GHz vs 2.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 48MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Lower TDP (270W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +1%
1934
Intel Xeon W 3365
1902
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +14%
20933
Intel Xeon W 3365
18361
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-W
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)

Package

52.56 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
270 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
81 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.25 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
32
Total Core Count
32
64
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.5
Multiplier
27.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
48 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
12
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
4
128
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy