Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 with 72 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 360W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
245 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.7 GHz
96
Total Core Count
72
192
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy