Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4116

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4116

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Silver 4116 with 12 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 16.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +146%
1984
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
805
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +190%
19940
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
6869
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2017
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Skylake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Silver (Skylake-SP)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
85 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
96
Total Core Count
12
192
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
16.5 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy