Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Xeon LC3528

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Xeon LC3528

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon LC3528 with 2 cores 1.733GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 800)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.733GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 45nm)
Xeon LC3528 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 360W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2010
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Jasper Forest
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 1366
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon(Jasper Forest)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.866 GHz
96
Total Core Count
2
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
13.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3-800
12
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy