AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Intel Xeon Gold 5418N
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Gold 5418N with 24 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4000)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 45MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Intel Xeon Gold 5418N 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 360W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
+37%
2075
Intel Xeon Gold 5418N
1508
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
+125%
22897
Intel Xeon Gold 5418N
10149
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Gold (Sapphire Rapids-SP)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
165 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
84 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
96
Total Core Count
24
192
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
18.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
45 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4000
12
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
128
PCIe Lanes
80
