AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Xeon Platinum 8268
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon Platinum 8268 with 24 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Xeon Platinum 8268 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (205W vs 360W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
+105%
2075
Xeon Platinum 8268
1012
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
+544%
22897
Xeon Platinum 8268
3553
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Dec 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
205 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
96
Total Core Count
24
192
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
29.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
35.75 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
