AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Celeron N5100

VS

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with 16 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Celeron N5100 with 4 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX 's Advantages

Released 3 years late

Better graphics card performance

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 4MB)

Intel Celeron N5100 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR4x-2933 vs DDR5-5200)

Lower TDP (6W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +171%

1882

Intel Celeron N5100

692

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +1737%

33284

Intel Celeron N5100

1811

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +462%

2688

Intel Celeron N5100

478

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX +1157%

15655

Intel Celeron N5100

1245

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

VS

Intel Celeron N5100

General Parameters

Jan 2024

Release Date

Jan 2021

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen 4 (Dragon Range)

Core Architecture

Jasper Lake

-

Processor Number

N5100

AMD Socket FL1

Socket

BGA-1338

Radeon 610M

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 24 EUs

Package

13.14 billions

Transistor Count

-

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

AMD Socket FL1

Socket

BGA-1338

55 W

Power Consumption

6 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

16

Performance Cores

4

32

Performance Core Threads

4

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.1 GHz

5.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Total Core Count

4

32

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24

Multiplier

11x

64 K per core

L1 Cache

-

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

384 K per core

64 MB

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5200

Memory Types

DDR4-2666, LPDDR4x-2933

64 GB

Max Memory Size

16 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

45.8 GB/s

-

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

400 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

2200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

800 MHz

128

Shader Units

256

8

Texture Units

16

4

Raster Operation Units

8

2

Execution Units

24

15 W

Power Consumption

10 W

0.563 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.3 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Celeron N5100

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

28

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

3

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i9 14900HX

4

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i9 13980HX

5

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i7 13705H

6

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core 7 160UL

7

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5 1035G4

8

Intel Core i7 14700HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

9

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5 11260H

10

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i3 1220P

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD