Home Comparison AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Intel Xeon E5 1620

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Intel Xeon E5 1620

We compared two server CPUs: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-5600 vs DDR3)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 10MB)
Lower TDP (28W vs 130W)
Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.5GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U +265%
2519
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U +306%
10308
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
VS

General Parameters

Apr 2024
Release Date
Mar 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Hawk Point
Core Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
Radeon 760M
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)

Package

25 billions
Transistor Count
1.27 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
28 W
Power Consumption
130 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
178 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
Package
FC-LGA10

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
6
Total Core Count
4
12
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
36.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
10 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR3
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
20
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy