Apple M4 Max 16 Core vs Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
We compared two laptop CPUs: Apple M4 Max 16 Core with 16 cores 4.52GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 134U with 12 cores 0.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Apple M4 Max 16 Core 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 5)
Larger memory bandwidth (546GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.52GHz vs 0.7GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U 's Advantages
Lower TDP (9W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Apple M4 Max 16 Core
+85%
3984
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
2146
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Apple M4 Max 16 Core
+206%
26185
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
8540
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2023
Apple
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
ARMv9
Instruction Set
-
Apple M4
Core Architecture
Meteor Lake
Apple M-Socket
Socket
Intel BGA 2551
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe-LPG 64EU
-
Generation
Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake)
Package
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
9 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
110°C
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
12
Performance Cores
2
12
Performance Core Threads
4
4.52 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
0.7 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
10
4
Efficiency Core Threads
10
2.59 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
500 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
16
Total Core Count
12
16
Total Thread Count
14
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
45
Multiplier
7.0
-
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
-
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
LPDDR5X-8533
Memory Types
DDR5
Depends on motherboard
-
Max Memory Channels
2
546 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
500 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
5120
Shader Units
-
320
Texture Units
-
160
Raster Operation Units
-
640
Execution Units
-
62
Power Consumption
-
18.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
