Arc A370M vs Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Alchemist
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
M66
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
