Arc A380 vs FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
FirePro D300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+92%
4198
FirePro D300
2176
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
