Arc A380 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+744%
4198
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV670
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
