Arc A380 vs NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+10664%
4198
NVS 300
39
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
