ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
FirePro D300
+1411%
2176
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
20
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
