ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 106W)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
+213%
451
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
120
Shading Units
144
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF116
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1