ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
Radeon R7 265
+1215%
1894
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
16
120
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
