Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 72F3

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 72F3

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC 72F3 with 8 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 180W)
AMD EPYC 72F3 's Advantages
Released 120 years and 2 months late
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
AMD EPYC 72F3 +129%
1805
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
AMD EPYC 72F3 +186%
11422
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Centaur CHA
508
AMD EPYC 72F3 +187%
1460
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3379
AMD EPYC 72F3 +347%
15109
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Mar 2021
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Milan
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Package

-
Transistor Count
33.2 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
180 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
195 mm²
Die Size
8x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
37.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
1
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
44
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy