Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon E5 1650

Centaur CHA vs Intel Xeon E5 1650

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1650 with 6 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
Intel Xeon E5 1650 's Advantages
Released 111 years and 2 months late
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
Intel Xeon E5 1650 +4%
819
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
Intel Xeon E5 1650 +43%
5726
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Mar 2012
VIA
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)

Package

-
Transistor Count
2.27 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
130 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
195 mm²
Die Size
435 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
8
Total Core Count
6
8
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
32.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
4
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
44
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy