Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1950MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+123%
3994
Quadro M2000
1786
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GM206
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
