Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3786%
16790
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
