Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+10393%
16790
Quadro FX 3600M
160
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
64
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
32
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
