Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro K6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2050MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+223%
16790
Quadro K6000
5196
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
4096
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
48
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
