Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (2050MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+840%
16790
Quadro M2000
1786
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM206
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
