Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (2050MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+233%
16790
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5032
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
64
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
