Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs RTX A5500

Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2050MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
RTX A5500 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
16790
RTX A5500 +103%
34100

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1080 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
4096
Shading Units
10240
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
32
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA102
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net