Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
16032 additional rendering cores
Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+7161%
52430
Quadro 5000
722
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
11
16384
Shading Units
352
1024
TMUs
44
0
ROPs
40
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
152W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
