Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro M520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+6453%
52430
Quadro M520 Mobile
800
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
16384
Shading Units
384
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
25W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GM108
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1280 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
